ponedjeljak, 25. siječnja 2016.



Jesu li me unišili zbog mojih naučnih otkića'


V Opasni lijekovi u prometu


obavještavam Vas da postoji osnovana sumnja da klinika <sunce iz zenice pušta u promet lijekove opasne po život. (Lijek  neurozsn. Meni su dali taj lijek,  pa su me pretvorili u invalida. Uništili su moj mozak.  Ne mogu da oblačim  ili skidam odjeću, da se kupam, da hodam, itd. To je gore od smrti.

nedjelja, 23. siječnja 2011.

Algorithm and computational complexity of Solar System(5)


In the previous examples we translated the Orbital characteristics from the language of astronomy into the digital language of programmatic, cybernetic and information principles. This we did by using the adequate mathematical algorithms. These digital pictures reveal to us a whole new dimension of this science. They reveal to us that the astronomical phenomenons are strictly conditioned and determined by programmatic, cybernetic and information principles.

From the previous examples we can see that Solar System really has its quantitative characteristics. It can be concluded that there is a connection between quantitative characteristics in the process of transfer of orbital information and the qualitative appearance of given astronomical phenomenons.

Conclusions

The result of this research show that there is a matrix code for Solar System. Now we have the exact scientific proofs that there is an astronomical language that can be described by the theory of systems and cybernetics, and which functions in accordance with certain principles.

DISCLOSURE

The author reports no conflict of interest in this research.

REFERENCES

[01] L.Kurić, The digital language of amino acids. Amino Acids (2007) 653-661.

[02] L.Kurić, The Atomic Genetic Code. J. Comput Sci Biol 2 (2009) 101-116.

[03] L.Kurić, Mesure complexe des caracteristiques dynamiques de series temporelles

“Journal de la Societe de statistique de Paris”- tome 127, No 2.1986.

[04] L.Kurić, The Insulin Bio Code - Zero Frenquencies, GJMR Vol. 10 Issue 1: 15 May

2010.

[05] L.Kurić, Molecular biocoding of insulin, Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics

and Chemistry, Jul. 2010.p.45 – 58.

[06] L.Kurić, The Insulin Bio Code – Prima sequences, GJMR Vol. 1 Issue 1: 15 June

2010.

[07] L.Kurić, ATOMIC HEMOGLOBIN CODE, GJMR Volume 10 Issue 2, October 2010.

[08] L.Kurić, Language of Insulin Decoded:Discret code 1128, IJPBS JOURNAL,

October 2010.

[09] L.Kurić, „Measures of Bio Insulin Frequencies“, IJCSET (Volume 1. Issue 4.

December, 2010)

[10] L.Kurić, The Insulin Bio Code - Standard Deviation, International Journal of Scientific

and Engineering Research (IJSER) Nov 25, 2010 under ISSN 2229-5518.

[11] L.Kurić, Molecular biocoding of insulin – amino acid Gly, International Journal of

Scientific and Engineering Research (IJSER) - March 2011 issue.

[12] L.Kurić, Algorithm and computational complexity of Insulin, International Journal of

Computer Technology and Application (IJCTA) - Feb 2011 issue.


Algorithm and computational complexity of Solar System(4)

In those examples, the planetary astronomical progression APa and APb as a result was given the discret codes.

As we see, the Solar System code is itself a unique structure of program, cybernetic and informational system and law. The research we carried out have shown that astronomical progression are one of quantitative characteristics in astronomy. Astronomical progression is, actually, a discrete code that protects and guards planetary information coded in Solar System. This a recently discovered code, and more detailed knowledge on it is yet to be discovered. In a similar way we shall calculate astronomical codes of other unions of panets. Once we do this, we will find out that all these unions of planets are connected by various codes, analogue codes as well as other quantitative features. Examples:

Discrete planetary code 20271549917

16

I

Perihelion

I

APa

20271549917

I

0

I

APb

20271549917

I

Perihelion

Merkur

1


Merkur

Neptune

1

15

I

I

Perihelion

Perihelion

I

I

APa

46001200

15717603427

I

I

20271549917

20271549917

I

I

APb

20225548717

4553946490

I

I

Aphelion

Aphelion

Merkur

Neptune

2

16


(20225548717+46001200) = 20271549917;

(4553946490+15717603427) = 20271549917;

Merkur

Uranus

2

14

I

I

Aphelion

Aphelion

I

I

APa

115818100

11264662594

I

I

20271549917

20271549917

I

I

APb

20155731817

9006887323

I

I

Perihelion

Perihelion

Venus

Neptune

3

15


Venus

Uranus

3

13

I

I

Perihelion

Perihelion

I

I

APa

223294359

8260242890

I

I

20271549917

20271549917

I

I

APb

20048255558

12011307027

I

I

Aphelion

Aphelion

Venus

Uranus

4

14


Venus

Saturn

4

12

I

I

Aphelion

Aphelion

I

I

APa

332236468

5511304429

I

I

20271549917

20271549917

I

I

APb

19939313449

14760245488

I

I

Perihelion

Perihelion

EARTH

Uranus

5

13


EARTH

Saturn

5

11

I

I

Perihelion

Perihelion

I

I

APa

479334758

3997978646

I

I

20271549917

20271549917

I

I

APb

19792215159

16273571271

I

I

Aphelion

Aphelion

EARTH

Saturn

6

12


EARTH

Jupiter

6

10

I

I

Aphelion

Aphelion

I

I

APa

631432990

2644405690

I

I

20271549917

20271549917

I

I

APb

19640116927

17627144227

I

I

Perihelion

Perihelion

Mars

Saturn

7

11

In this example there is also a mathematical balance between astronomical progression APa and APb.

Astronomical progression presented in previous figures are calculated using the relationship between corresponding groups of those progressions. These are groups with different progression. There are different ways and methods of selecting these groups of progressions, which method is most efficient some We hope that science will determine which method is most efficient for this selection.